TrollEye Security

Customer Success • DevSecOps

Releasing Products With No Known Vulnerabilities How One Software Company Reduced Total Vulnerabilities by 97.5%

Annual penetration testing provided valuable insight, but it could not keep pace with a constantly changing development environment. By embedding continuous security testing, validation, remediation support, and retesting into its release process, the company eliminated critical vulnerabilities and built a repeatable model for releasing more secure products.

FinTech Software Development 500–1,000 Employees Austin, Texas
Four Years of Measurable Reduction
97.5%
reduction in total vulnerabilities

Measured across annual full-scope assessments throughout the engagement.

90%+ of the reduction achieved in the first 12 months
Zero critical vulnerabilities remaining today
Primary Objective
Release products with no known vulnerabilities.
A DevSecOps Transformation

Building secure software at the speed of development.

Instead of treating security as a periodic assessment, this software company set out to make it part of how its products were built.

Over four years, TrollEye worked alongside its security and development teams to embed continuous testing, validate findings, and strengthen remediation practices across the software development lifecycle.

The result was not simply fewer findings. It was a measurable and sustained reduction in organizational risk.

97.5% Vulnerability reduction Across the total vulnerability count
90% Achieved in year one Most of the improvement happened quickly
Zero Critical vulnerabilities Critical findings were eliminated
4+ Years Sustained partnership Improvements held as development continued
The Challenge

Every release introduced new risk.

With multiple fintech applications in production and new releases throughout the year, the organization’s software changed far faster than its annual security assessments could keep pace.

Traditional penetration testing remained valuable, but it represented only a snapshot in time. New vulnerabilities could be introduced months after testing was complete, leaving security teams with limited visibility and developers without timely feedback.

The company was not looking for more reports. It needed security to become part of the development lifecycle.

The Existing Model

Annual Penetration Testing

One assessment provided visibility into a constantly changing development environment.

Annual assessment Applications are evaluated at a single point in time.
New releases ship Features and code changes continue throughout the year.
New vulnerabilities appear Issues may remain undiscovered between assessments.
Feedback arrives later Developers address issues further from the point of creation.
Next annual assessment The backlog is reviewed after months of additional change.
The Required Model

Continuous DevSecOps

Security validation operates alongside development instead of waiting for the next annual testing window.

Code and product changes are reviewed Security keeps pace with ongoing development.
Findings are validated Developers receive credible evidence instead of noise.
Remediation begins earlier Issues are addressed closer to the point of creation.
Fixes are retested Resolution is verified before the work is closed.
Risk declines over time Continuous improvement replaces periodic cleanup.
The Strategic Shift

Security moved inside the development lifecycle.

Rather than evaluating applications once each year, the organization adopted a continuous DevSecOps approach that identified vulnerabilities earlier, supported developers during remediation, and reduced the likelihood that known issues would reach production.

The Solution

TrollEye turned security findings into developer action.

TrollEye built a continuous application security program around four connected activities: recurring testing, human validation, developer-ready remediation guidance, and retesting.

Rather than delivering another report, TrollEye worked directly with the company’s security and development teams to move each validated finding through remediation and verified resolution.

How the Program Worked

Every finding moved through a defined remediation process.

The program connected testing, validation, developer support, and verification instead of treating them as separate activities.

01

Test Continuously

Applications and product changes were assessed throughout the year, keeping security aligned with active development.

  • Recurring application testing
  • Coverage between releases
  • Earlier issue detection
02

Validate the Risk

Findings were reviewed before reaching developers, removing noise and providing clear technical evidence.

  • Human validation
  • False-positive reduction
  • Actionable evidence
03

Support Remediation

Developers received guidance to address both the immediate vulnerability and the coding pattern behind it.

  • Developer-ready guidance
  • Root-cause remediation
  • Secure coding support
04

Verify the Fix

Completed remediation was retested and measured to confirm that exposure continued to decline.

  • Resolution verification
  • Trend measurement
  • Ongoing accountability
The Difference

Direct collaboration moved remediation forward.

TrollEye’s security experts worked alongside developers to explain findings, answer technical questions, guide remediation, and improve the practices that caused vulnerabilities to recur. The engagement was designed to help the team fix problems, not simply document them.

The Resulting Model Findings moved from validated security evidence to accountable remediation and verified resolution.
The Outcome

The company did not just reduce its backlog. It changed how security operated.

Continuous testing identified vulnerabilities earlier. Human validation reduced noise. Direct collaboration gave developers the context and support needed to address both individual findings and the underlying causes behind recurring issues.

Retesting then confirmed that those improvements held as new products, features, and releases continued. The organization built a repeatable security model designed to support the release of products with no known vulnerabilities.

Outcome 01 97.5%

Reduction in total vulnerabilities

The organization reduced its overall vulnerability backlog by more than 97.5%, with approximately 90% of that reduction achieved during the first 12 months.

Outcome 02 Zero

Critical vulnerabilities

Critical vulnerabilities were reduced to zero as the organization identified issues earlier, corrected root causes, and verified that fixes remained effective.

Outcome 03 No Known

Vulnerabilities at release

Continuous testing and remediation became part of the development lifecycle, supporting the company’s objective of releasing products with no known vulnerabilities.

The Lasting Result Security became part of how products were developed and released, allowing the company to sustain its improvements across more than four years of continued growth and change.
Turn Exposure Into Action

Ready to reduce your vulnerability backlog?

See how TrollEye combines continuous testing, validation, and remediation support to help security and development teams achieve measurable, sustained risk reduction.

Continuous exposure management Validated security findings Remediation support
Live Webinar

From Discovery to
Risk Reduction

Operationalizing CTEM in Modern Security Programs

Date September 24, 2026
Time 2:00 PM Eastern

Learn how modern security teams can move beyond finding exposures and operationalize every stage of Continuous Threat Exposure Management.

01 Scope
02 Discover
03 Prioritize
04 Validate
05 Mobilize
Reserve Your Spot

Free registration · Live discussion and Q&A

This Content Is Gated